From: Nitro Drops (nitrodrops@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Apr 14 2008 - 19:31:14 ART
Thanks mate, it works now
it hits the next hop directly. and no more loops.
you are a legend.
cheers
Nit
> From: joe@affirmedsystems.com
> To: nitrodrops@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: EIGRP - Unequal-Cost LoadBalancing
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:18:24 -0400
>
> CEF which supersedes the routing table will cause the oldest route to be
> used.
>
> Disable cef
>
> No ip cef
>
> And then tell us what you found.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Nitro Drops
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:53 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: EIGRP - Unequal-Cost LoadBalancing
>
> Guys,
>
> was practising this scenario.
>
> R4 S2/1 (155.1.45.4/24) >> 64K Serial 64K>> (155.1.45.5/24)S2/1 R5
> R4 S2/0 (155.1.0.4/24) >> 256 K Frame Relay 256K >> (155.1.0.5/24) S2/0 R5
> R4 Loopback 0 - 150.1.4.4
> R5 Loopback 0 - 150.1.5.5
>
> Variance calculated is 4.
>
> R5:
> router eigrp 100
> variance 4
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> R5#sh ip eigrp neighbors
> IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 100
> H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT
> RTO Q Seq
> (sec) (ms) Cnt Num
> 1 155.1.0.4 Se2/0 150 00:42:28 189 1134 0 29
> 0 155.1.45.4 Se2/1 12 00:44:48 191 2280 0 30
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> R5#sh ip
> route
> Gateway of last resort is not set
> 155.1.0.0/24 is
> subnetted, 2 subnets
> C 155.1.0.0 is
> directly connected, Serial2/0
> C 155.1.45.0 is
> directly connected, Serial2/1
> 150.1.0.0/24 is
> subnetted, 2 subnets
> C 150.1.5.0 is
> directly connected, Loopback0
> D 150.1.4.0 [90/40640000] via 155.1.45.4,
> 00:00:46, Serial2/1
> [90/10639872] via 155.1.0.4,
> 00:00:46, Serial2/0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> R5#trace 150.1.4.4
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 150.1.4.4
> 1 155.1.45.4 156
> msec
> 155.1.0.4 148 msec
> 155.1.45.4 28 msec
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> R5#trace 150.1.4.4
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 150.1.4.4
> 1 155.1.0.4 176 msec
> 155.1.45.4 128
> msec
> 155.1.0.4 152 msec
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> R5#trace 150.1.4.4
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 150.1.4.4
> 1 155.1.0.4 168 msec
> 180 msec *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> R5#trace 150.1.4.4
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 150.1.4.4
> 1 155.1.0.4 152 msec
> 40 msec *
>
>
> I can see the packets being load-balanced when tracing from R4 to R5's
> loopback. Did 4 traces continuously and noticed the follows
>
> Q1.) For the 1st 2 traces, how come the packets reaches R4's S2/1 interface,
> it will go to R4's S2/0 interface again before hitting R4's loopback? The
> same goes for the 2nd trace, it will go to R4's S2/0 interface 1st, followed
> by R4's S2/1 interface before reaching R4's loopback.
>
> Q2) For the 3rd and 4th traces, it hits the R4's loopback0 immediately as
> next hop, without hitting R4's S2/0 or S2/1.
>
>
> Appreciate any kind advice.
>
>
> Cheers
> Nit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Easily manage multiple email accounts with Windows Live Mail!
> http://www.get.live.com/wl/all
>
>
> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:51 ART