From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2008 - 12:47:37 ART
Why? Don't you run the risk of oversubscribing the circut during some
intervals?
I should have asked for the logic behind the answer given with responses my
bad
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris McGuire" <cmcguire@firstdigital.com>
To: "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: Frame traffic shaping
>I would say you would choose 1536 - 512K for the BE on DLCI 2.
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
>
> On 4/10/08 9:20 AM, "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Lets say you have an interface with two pvc's, and a port speed of 1536k.
>> You
>> want DLCI 1 to have a cir of 128k and no BE and a TC of 50 ms. DLCI 2
>> has a
>> cir of 512k with the BE equal to the remaining bandwidth of the
>> interface(TC
>> is the same as DLCI 1). Does the BE for DLCI 2 equal 1536k-640k(the sum
>> of
>> the cir's for DLCI 1 and 2)/20 or does it equal 1536k-512k (the speed of
>> DLCI
>> 2)/20
>>
>>
>> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
>> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
> http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Pass the CCIE in six weeks, Guaranteed!
http://www.certscience.com/CCIE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:50 ART