From: Navid Daghighi (smart4D@free.fr)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2008 - 16:35:03 ART
There is a very interesting article on
http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/01/04/using-extended-access-lists-in-a-distribute-list/
It looks like there are 3 interpretations for an extended ACL :
A/ "normal" interpretation :
- source
- destination
B/ as a "prefix-list"
- address
- mask
C/ as a "who/what"
- who advertises this subnet
- what subnet is concerned
Interpretation B will be used in :
- a route-map used for redistribution betwen 2 IGPs
- in "distribute-list ACL in" for BGP
Interpretation C will be used in :
- "distribute-list ACL in" for an IGP
Is this correct ?
Thanks,
Navid
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:49 ART