From: jerry.du@accenture.com
Date: Tue Apr 01 2008 - 11:53:18 ART
mstp can not resolve the delay of stp reconverge which is mumtaz's
concern.
________________________________
From: raul raul [mailto:juvenn@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:12 PM
To: Du, Jerry; abuammargee@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: HSRP distance issue.
you can turn on mstp
> Subject: RE: HSRP distance issue.
> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:53:14 +0800
> From: jerry.du@accenture.com
> To: abuammargee@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> hehe, the HSRP is usually run between two layer 3 switch for
redundancy.
> I believe HSRP is good enough for your solution.
>
> If the Rapid-Spanning-tree is not quick enough for your case, the
other
> way would be recommand is use L3 function between access switch and
core
> switch and place default gateway in each access switch for client
> access. but, please note the subnet will be split to many small
subnets
> which must summary in core level.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> mumtaz ali
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 4:08 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: HSRP distance issue.
>
> I have a question to ask.
>
> Is it possible to have HSRP running on two routers, which are
physically
> quite distance from each other. Cisco does not recommand the setup, as
> it will cause delay issue, within Spanning-Tree.
> Could anyone pls advise that what could be the best method to have two
> distance routers working as Active & Standby on the same subnet?
>
> Many Thanks
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:49 ART