From: raul raul (juvenn@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 01 2008 - 09:12:06 ART
you can turn on mstp
> Subject: RE: HSRP distance issue.> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:53:14 +0800> From: jerry.du@accenture.com> To: abuammargee@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com> > hehe, the HSRP is usually run between two layer 3 switch for redundancy.> I believe HSRP is good enough for your solution.> > If the Rapid-Spanning-tree is not quick enough for your case, the other> way would be recommand is use L3 function between access switch and core> switch and place default gateway in each access switch for client> access. but, please note the subnet will be split to many small subnets> which must summary in core level.> > > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> mumtaz ali> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 4:08 PM> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: HSRP distance issue.> > I have a question to ask.> > Is it possible to have HSRP running on two routers, which are physically> quite distance from each other. Cisco does not recommand the se!
tup, as> it will cause delay issue, within Spanning-Tree.> Could anyone pls advise that what could be the best method to have two> distance routers working as Active & Standby on the same subnet?> > Many Thanks> > _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.> > _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:49 ART