From: Mike Haddad (mike.haddad@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2008 - 21:58:15 ART
Thanks I know it is not the right way. I just ran into IE Lab and they did one
peer statement on one of the routers and that made me puzzeled.
From: swm@emanon.comTo: mike.haddad@hotmail.com; rik@guyler.net;
smorris@ipexpert.com; ccielab@groupstudy.comSubject: RE: NTP Peer vs NTP
ServerDate: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:36:43 -0400
If you do peer, both sides need it. That's NOT the recommended way to do
things though! :)
From: Mike Haddad [mailto:mike.haddad@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 24,
2008 5:30 PMTo: Scott Morris; 'Rik Guyler'; 'Scott Morris';
ccielab@groupstudy.comSubject: RE: NTP Peer vs NTP Server
Hello, THanks for the clarification. When we have the below situation shall
we configure both sides as peer to each others or it is enough to set it on
one? Thanks,> From: swm@emanon.com> To: rik@guyler.net; smorris@ipexpert.com;
mike.haddad@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE: NTP Peer vs NTP
Server> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:04:49 -0400> > Yup, that would be correct.
That why, when you have one peer reset and it's> clock is 1993 or 2000 for a
year, it takes a REALLY long time to sync up,> and screws everyone else up in
the process! :) > > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Rik> Guyler> Sent: Sunday, March
23, 2008 7:41 PM> To: 'Scott Morris'; 'Mike Haddad'; ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: NTP Peer vs NTP Server> > So they'll eventually agree on a time
more or less in the middle? One would> eventually jump ahead (in 2 minute
increments max) and the other would jump> back 30 minutes or so?> > Rik > >
-----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> Scott Morris> Sent: Sunday, March
23, 2008 1:18 PM> To: 'Mike Haddad'; ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE: NTP
Peer vs NTP Server> > With peers, nobody has authoritative time. That means,
you might think it's> 1pm and I may think it's 2pm, but we have no idea who is
right so BOTH of us> will adjust our time (max of 2 minutes each jump) until
we finally> compromise.> > With client/server, the server actually has the
authority, so clients will> jump their time no matter how far off it is.> >
HTH,> > > > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
#4713, JNCIE-M> #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER> VP -
Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor> >
smorris@ipexpert.com> > > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444> Fax: +1.810.454.0130>
http://www.ipexpert.com> > > > > > -----Original Message-----> From:
nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Mike>
Haddad> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 12:53 PM> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: NTP Peer vs NTP Server> > Hello,> > Anybody have an answer for my
below question?> > Thanks,> > > > From: mike.haddad@hotmail.comTo:
ccielab@groupstudy.comSubject: NTP Peer vs> NTP ServerDate: Fri, 21 Mar 2008
23:43:47 -0700> > > Hello, I went through the documentation to identify what
is the difference> between NTP server and NTP peer statements. The only
difference I could> find is that ntp peer allows both hosts to sync with each
others while ntp> server> allows the host only to sync with the time server.
THe question is when> should i use the peer and when should I use the server
when the question> specifies to sync with BB1? Thanks for the calrification,
Regards,> > Is your lingo strong enough to ace these new word puzzles from
Live Search> Games? Click here to test your vocab!>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART