From: Rana Bilal (rab_91@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2008 - 15:05:33 ART
Folks-
Please check that link. I found it helpfull understanding the Route-reflectors
behavior.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/bgp-toc.html#routereflectors
Ahmad B. Rana> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:49:47 -0400> From:
nilsi2002@gmail.com> To: kindycisco@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Client to Client
route via Route Reflector on same Cluster> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com> > >
Could you explain the relationship between RR1 and RR2? Are they treating> >
each other like an RR client?> > If so then you could stop Client1 or 2 from
passing updates to each other> > with the command "no bgp> > client-to-client
reflection" on RR1 or RR2.> >> > In any other case I don't see any problem
passing updates from Client1 to> > Client2> >> > -Rich> >> >> > On 3/24/08,
kindy <kindycisco@hotmail.com> wrote:> > >> > > Hi,> > >> > > here is my
diagram> > >> > > Client1 --- RR1 --- RR2 --- Client2> > >> > > is it possible
to update route between client 1 and client 2 with RR1> > > and RR2 on same
cluster> > > Client 1 only peer to RR1 and Client 2 only peer RR2?> > >> > >
Rgds,> > > Kindy> > >> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART