From: steveaggie@gmail.com
Date: Mon Mar 24 2008 - 13:31:17 ART
Ahsan,
What you have said is true. However keep in mind that if have a scenario
where you redistribute RIP into OSPF then the route propagates through OSPF
and there is mutual distribution on another router the original RIP route
can be picked up again by OSPF and make its way back to the original router.
In that scenario you would need to specify RIP AD 109 to prevent the
original router from taking the OSPF advertisement.
Hope that's somewhat clear.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ahsan Mohiuddin
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:17 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Mutual redist on the same router
Hello Group,
just to be a 100% sure, can anyone confirm that mutual redistribution
between two routing protocols on the same router would automatically filter
redundant information, so that no routing loops are formed? (Hence no need
for distrib-lists/route-m)
For example, if RIP is redistributed into OSPF on a router, and OSPF is
redistributed back into RIP on that same router, then RIP won't drop its
original routes in favor of the new OSPF-learned routes?
Much thanks
Ahsan
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART