From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Sat Mar 22 2008 - 12:18:42 ART
>Have I missed something here?
No to be a d1ck, but many have asked before that this forum NOT become a
workbook back and forth...
Frankly, I solved that lab 7 months ago with little fuss and muss.
So, in an effort to help you (and the countless people here that aren't
doing IE WB's)
Here is the proper link...
http://forum.internetworkexpert.com/ubbthreads.php
You can probably already find quite a bit of chatter and solutions about
exactly the WB/Task you're on.
Good luck with the watermelon juice
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Whittle
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 8:54 AM
To: CCIE Lab Group Study
Subject: Lab 16 - OSPF over BVI?
Hi all,
R1 and R2 both have 192.10.1.0/24 attached to the Fa0/0 interface. There is
a FR WAN link between R1 and R2 on the Se0/0 interfaces. In the lab you need
to bridge the connections to allow traffic to pass between the subnets over
the FR link. I see that OSPF doesn't form between R1 and R2 under these
conditions. Is that normal?
Before I did Q3.3 I could ping 150.1.1.1 from R3 or 150.1.2.2 from R3 that
works. Once I completed Q3.3 and summarized the loopbacks for R1 and R2 I
noticed I was no longer able to ping the loopbacks. Well I was getting 50%
packet loss. When I did some investigating is seems that R1 and R2 can't
ping each others loopbacks directly, it needs to ping through R3. So when
the summary was sent to R3 from both R1 and R2 you would get one packet
succeed if it went directly and one fail if it want via the other router.
Have I missed something here? Should OSPF be up between R1 and R2?
Thanks again.
Regards,
Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART