From: Patrick J Greene (patrickg@layer8llc.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2008 - 00:39:48 ART
Actually I just deployed my first Waas deployment between a couple data centers and it went great. I am getting between 80-90% traffic reduction.
What's the point of injecting heresay about some folks who can't get a solutions working. I would be more inclined to blame the tech for not being able to follow directions.
If you're going to criticize, be constructive. Any moroon can point out problems.
----- Original Message -----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com <nobody@groupstudy.com>
To: 'raul raul' <juvenn@hotmail.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Mon Mar 17 23:34:05 2008
Subject: RE: OT Cisco loses to riverbed in wan optimization
Yes, the WAAS is a turd... surprised?
I heard a horror story about all these networks guys it took to get the WAAS
working only 50% for one client, so they just got Riverbeds instead. The
Riverbeds just went in and worked 100% almost plug and play. This was not
marketing fluff, it was a friend who works with both...
I'm doing an implementation of some riverbeds (2 pairs) for somebody so if
you want to come play with them and do some bandwidth tests (compression,
speed, response, etc in a lab, unicast me if your around NYC).
Here a link to the rcsp, I'm going to bang that out over a week this
spring...
-Joe
http://www.riverbed.com/support/certification/study_guide_199-01-v043007.pdf
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of raul
raul
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:48 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OT Cisco loses to riverbed in wan optimization
Hi Group ;
Cisco loses to Riverbed in WAN optimization bake-off.
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23604?page=1&t51hb=
Anybody have any idea on this product ? it seem superb on their marketing
strategy .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART