Re: RIP filtering question

From: Paul Cosgrove (paul.cosgrove@heanet.ie)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2008 - 19:56:09 ARST


Just had another thought. If you can only use those two routers you can
create a tunnel between them using IPs in different major network,
running rip only on that. Can then perform redistribution from ospf
into rip on R2.

Paul.

Paul Cosgrove wrote:
> What is the rest of the topology like? Does the scenario allow you
> to perform the redistribution on a third router instead (tunneling if
> necessary)? If it is allowed, you will need to set an offset list on
> the interface between R1 & R2 so the link to the redistributing
> router is preferred for those RIP routes.
>
> Paul.
>
> SCOTT PENDLETON wrote:
>> Anybody have any idea of how to approach this?
>>
>> Two routers connected each to other exchanging RIP routes. Router 2
>> has 3 additional interfaces that fall under the major network the two
>> routers share. Router 2 is also running OSPF. Router 1 is to learn
>> about the other networks via OSPF redistributed into the RIP process
>> and not directly from RIP on R2. Route-maps are not permitted.
>> Scott P.
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART