Re: Can't receive RIPng routes on LAN interface configured with

From: Carlos Alberto Trujillo Jimenez (carlos.trujillo.jimenez@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2008 - 13:30:20 ARST

• Next message: Amnuay: "How many static route allow on each router"
• Previous message: C Chan: "Track CRC error on 3550/3560 FE interface"
• Maybe in reply to: YourPal: "Can't receive RIPng routes on LAN interface configured with"
• Next in thread: Todd, Douglas M.: "RE: Can't receive RIPng routes on LAN interface configured with"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Is there a restriction to enable TUNNELING and assign IPV6 ADDRESS to the
TUNNEL interface?

If I was faced with it I will use tunnel interface and use BVI interfaces as
the tunnel source or destionation..

Anyway, IRB does not suppprt IPV6.

2008/3/10, YourPal <dearprudence28@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I have the following IPv6 RIPng scenario:
>
> R2 (fa0/0) -----VLAN22----- (fa0/0) BB2
>
> R2:
> !
> ipv6 unicast-routing
> bridge irb
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
> bridge 1 route ip
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> no ip address
> ipv6 address 2001:192:10:1::2/64
> ipv6 rip RIPng enable
> bridge-group 1
> !
> interface BVI1
> ip address 192.10.1.2 255.255.255.0
> !
>
>
> BB2:
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 192.10.1.254 255.255.255.0
> ipv6 address 2001:192:10:1::254/64
> ipv6 rip RIPng enable
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ipv6 address 2001:220:20:3::1/64
> ipv6 rip RIPng enable
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ipv6 address 2001:222:22:2::1/64
> ipv6 rip RIPng enable
> !
> interface Loopback3
> ipv6 address 2001:205:90:31::1/64
> ipv6 rip RIPng enable
> !
>
> Outputs of "deb ipv rip" on BB2:
>
> RIPng: Sending multicast update on FastEthernet0/0 for RIPng
> src=FE80::21B:54FF:FECE:1F84
> dst=FF02::9 (FastEthernet0/0)
> sport=521, dport=521, length=72
> command=2, version=1, mbz=0, #rte=3
> tag=0, metric=1, prefix=2001:220:20:3::/64
> tag=0, metric=1, prefix=2001:222:22:2::/64
> tag=0, metric=1, prefix=2001:205:90:31::/64
>
> However, R2 did not receive those RIPng routes from BB2 until I removed
> the
> "bridge-group 1" command from its Fa0/0 interface.
>
> Anyone be kind enough to explain why and advise a solution. The bridge
> group
> can't be removed because that will violate the requirement of an earlier
> task.
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> BR,
> Emil
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Amnuay: "How many static route allow on each router"
• Previous message: C Chan: "Track CRC error on 3550/3560 FE interface"
• Maybe in reply to: YourPal: "Can't receive RIPng routes on LAN interface configured with"
• Next in thread: Todd, Douglas M.: "RE: Can't receive RIPng routes on LAN interface configured with"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART