From: Skinner, Stephen (Stephen.Skinner@rbs.co.uk)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2008 - 11:10:43 ARST
If there is another task , then I would use 154.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
instead
HTH
Stephen
mail: Stephen.Skinner@rbs.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
Sent: 10 March 2008 12:12
To: YourPal; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Enabling OSPF using minimum network statements
If there is another task request you to enable another ospf area on int
fa0/0 and s0/0. Then can I use "network 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 area 0" to meet
this task requirement??
----- 6l%s-l%s ----
1H%s$H!R YourPal
<dearprudence28@gmail.com>
&,%s$H Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com> 6G0e$i4A!R 2008 &~
3$k 9 $i ,P4A$i $U$H 8:24:11 %DCD!G Enabling OSPF using minimum network
statements
Hi Group,
A router has the following IP
addresses:
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 154.1.38.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 154.1.3.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface
Serial0/0
ip address 154.1.0.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0/2
ip address
154.1.13.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0/3
ip address 154.1.23.3
255.255.255.0
!
The task requires to enable OSPF area 0 on interfaces Fa0/1, s0/2, and
s0/3 using the minimum amount of network statements necessary. Do not
enable area 0 on any other interfaces.
As hard as I tried, I'm not able
to use minimum network statements to cover those 3 interfaces without
covering s0/0. So I configured 3 statements as follows (to me, this is
the min.):
!
router ospf 1
network 154.1.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 154.1.13.3 0.0.0.0 area
0
network 154.1.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
Let me know if you have a solution that
meets the task requirement.
Thank you.
BR,
Emil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART