RE: Enabling OSPF using minimum network statements

From: Adel Abushaev (adel@netmasterclass.net)
Date: Sun Mar 09 2008 - 14:12:22 ARST


        Not to over-think the requirement, /18 aggregate will be good
enough, just give it 0.0.63.0, it will cover the first 64 subnets.
Otherwise, the differences between prefixes are complex enough to either not
to fit into one network statement, or there will be holes in the scope.

        From the other point, if the task is to not to have any statement
starting with "network ... " at all when solving this task, you can use "ip
ospf X area 0" on the interface, where X is the OSPF process number. Minimum
number of network statements, can't be any less than 0.

        #1 or #2 will really depend on the context, what is the point of the
task. Given that you have more than 1 valid solution, proctor will clarify
this for you. Not to mention, one of the solutions might be prohibited by
restrictions somewhere else in the scenario.

Cheers,

Adel.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Tony
Schaffran (GS)
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 6:39 AM
To: 'trade me'; 'YourPal'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Enabling OSPF using minimum network statements

How does network 154.1.13.3 0.0.0.15 area 0 match

ip address 154.1.3.3 255.255.255.0
ip address 154.1.23.3 255.255.255.0

Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
 
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
trade me
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 5:38 AM
To: YourPal; Cisco certification
Subject: RE: Enabling OSPF using minimum network statements

Hi BR,

It's late,

But my best is 154.1.0.0/20

154.1.[0-15].[0-255]

network 154.1.13.3 0.0.0.15 area 0

matt

----------------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:24:11 +0800
> From: dearprudence28@gmail.com
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Enabling OSPF using minimum network statements
>
> Hi Group,
>
> A router has the following IP addresses:
>
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 154.1.38.3 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/1
> ip address 154.1.3.3 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 154.1.0.3 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Serial0/2
> ip address 154.1.13.3 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Serial0/3
> ip address 154.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
> !
>
> The task requires to enable OSPF area 0 on interfaces Fa0/1, s0/2, and
s0/3
> using the minimum amount of network statements necessary. Do not enable
area
> 0 on any other interfaces.
>
> As hard as I tried, I'm not able to use minimum network statements to
cover
> those 3 interfaces without covering s0/0. So I configured 3 statements as
> follows (to me, this is the min.):
>
> !
> router ospf 1
> network 154.1.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 154.1.13.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 154.1.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> !
>
> Let me know if you have a solution that meets the task requirement.
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> BR,
> Emil
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART