Re: Lab exam SUCCEED or FAILED

From: Ed Lui (edwlui@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2008 - 04:02:41 ARST


Patrick,

That is TRUE. Thanks for pointing it out.

Would you spend sometime on my other question? I am still scratching my
head. My hairs keep dropping.

Cheers,
Lui

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Galligan" <pgalligan@gmail.com>
To: "Ed Lui" <edwlui@gmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Lab exam SUCCEED or FAILED

> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Ed Lui <edwlui@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2. I would like some clarification on tasks I lost points in the mock
>> lab. I
>> would really appreciate your input. The question says:
>>
>> . In order to ensure that critical traffic transiting your network gets
>> the
>> best service possible configure R6 so that critical traffic will not be
>> dropped unless there are 50 packets in the output queue.
>> . If there are 70 critical packets in the output queue R6 should
>> randomly drop
>> 2 out of every 16 of these packets.
>> . In the case that there are more than 70 critical packets in the output
>> queue, they should all be dropped.
>>
>> My answer to the task is :
>>
>> interface Serial0/0
>> ip address 54.9.1.6 255.255.255.0
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ip summary-address rip 129.9.0.0 255.255.128.0
>> random-detect
>> random-detect precedence 5 50 70 8
>> random-detect precedence 6 50 70 8 <------------------- EXTRA CONFIG
>> random-detect precedence 7 50 70 8 <------------------- EXTRA CONFIG
>
> Ed,
>
> Read the requirement again, take note of this statement - "In order to
> ensure that critical traffic transiting your network gets the best
> service possible.....".
>
> By configuring IPP 6 & 7 with same drop thresholds and probability,
> IPP 5 does NOT get the best service possible, it gets better service
> than IPP 1-4 but *the same* service as IPP 6 & 7.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:52 ART