Re: The old favourite - to map or not to map....

From: Sadiq Yakasai (sadiqtanko@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 28 2008 - 12:59:27 ARST

• Next message: Joseph Brunner: "RE: THANKS!!!!!"
• Previous message: Biggs, Jeff \(M/CIO/BIE\): "THANKS!!!!!"
• Maybe in reply to: Andy: "The old favourite - to map or not to map...."
• Next in thread: Marc La Porte: "Re: The old favourite - to map or not to map...."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Andy,

You are right. Once there is no IP address on an interface (main or
sub), L2 to L3 resolution for IP does not even happen and hence the
inverse-arp does not even kick in.

A few books out there have some little mistakes anyway, it could be the case.

• Next message: Joseph Brunner: "RE: THANKS!!!!!"
• Previous message: Biggs, Jeff \(M/CIO/BIE\): "THANKS!!!!!"
• Maybe in reply to: Andy: "The old favourite - to map or not to map...."
• Next in thread: Marc La Porte: "Re: The old favourite - to map or not to map...."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:50 ARST