RE: Unassigned CCIE query.

From: Tony Schaffran \(GS\) (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Wed Feb 27 2008 - 16:57:56 ARST


This topic touches on basic ethics and I would hope a CCIE would have a
higher standard.

Is it right for a company to just buy a CCIE number to get the partner
discounts and deceive their clients by claiming to be a gold partner or such
without really having the resources on hand?

To me, this just seems fundamentally wrong.

Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
 
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Tony
Varriale
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:48 AM
To: 'Darren Johnson'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Unassigned CCIE query.

Yes it is. I would recommend not using that service you listed. You can
easily find someone to take it if you are in a major metro area by asking
around and possible even from your local Cisco office.

Normal rates are $2-3k/month with a 12 month contract.

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Darren Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:41 AM
To: 'Cisco certification'
Subject: Unassigned CCIE query.

Hey all. As per my post last week, I passed the lab and now have an
unassigned CCIE number (I paid for study and lab myself). I'm now in a
position where I'm weighing up my options. Is it possible to 'rent' out my
CCIE number to a company, whilst still remaining employed by my present
employer? I have heard of rentacert.com but people seemed skeptical of it.

Let me stress, I DO NOT WANT TO VIOLATE ANY CISCO POLICIES and if renting
out a cert is doing so, I WILL NOT DO IT. However, if it is possible/legal
and people out there do it, can they kindly explain how it works. I want to
get as much value out of my cert as possible.

Thanks for ANY advice

Darren
#20078

                



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:50 ARST