From: Tony Schaffran \(GS\) (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Tue Feb 26 2008 - 17:46:56 ARST
Interesting.
You learn something new every day. :)
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Rik
Guyler
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:41 AM
To: 'Sadiq Yakasai'; 'dara tomar'
Cc: 'Joseph Brunner'; 'shiran guez'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: outbound load-balancing
Ohhh...you didn't go into your explanation very deeply but now I get it.
;-)
You're padding the route table with additional static defaults to tip the
weights since the router will balance the packets/flows over all valid
routes. This way we can pretty much get any ratio of balancing we want by
adding/subtracting routes over each outbound connection. I guess this goes
under the heading of "stupid router tricks"! ;-)
Thanks Sadiq for clearing up your post!
Rik
-----Original Message-----
From: Sadiq Yakasai [mailto:sadiqtanko@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:26 PM
To: dara tomar
Cc: Joseph Brunner; shiran guez; Rik Guyler; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: outbound load-balancing
Guys,
Have a look at this link here below. If you can create static routes and
have as much recursion to be done proportionately distributed on one more
than the other according to the bandwidth you have on links, then this is
equal-cost load balancing, but proportional to your bandwidth (which results
ultimately to an unequal load balancing).
http://ioshints.blogspot.com/search/label/load%20balancing
Sadiq
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:50 ARST