Re: I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more..

From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 23 2008 - 12:10:40 ARST


The lab will involve a bunch of possibilities. Anything implied or not asked
for that you think you may need to meet lab requirements check with the
proctor. There are many possible landmines such as split horizon that will
not be spelled out. The task you are required to perform may require other
things due to the inherant behavior of the protocols. The lab tests your
awareness of these behaviors to see if you can spot the issues and take
appropriate action. If routes do not appear in routers you may very well
still have work to do.

Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vijay babu" <dotcomvijay@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 12:51 AM
Subject: I thought we should do what was asked and nothing more..

> Hi everyone,
>
> I took the IE Mock lab 4 and thought I will pass it quite easliy
> but shockingly dint pass it..
>
> No doubt I had to improve my answer checking skills.. but I am bit
> confused
> if I just need to do what was asked or If I need to do bit more.. an
> example
> is , in the BGP section I was asked to create a new loopback and advertise
> it into BGP.
> I did exactly that. But I got 0 for BGP section as I dint redistribute
> this
> loopback into the IGP.
> but I wasnt told this to be done.
>
> So, in CCIE exam if the IGP and BGP if the question doesnt ask us to
> redistribute into each other or if they dint
> ask us to do a summarisation of the IGP routes into BGP, should we go
> ahead
> and do it??
>
> "Full reachability" does it also apply to routes learned from the
> backbones
> BGP AS aswell? Is it acceptable to
> do extra redistribution when we were not asked to do it?
>
> Cheers
> Vijay



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST