Question on UDLD...

From: Nambi Appachigounder (nambi_gct@yahoo.co.in)
Date: Wed Feb 20 2008 - 12:30:46 ARST

• Next message: Dinesh Patel: "test - first post"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Moving away from Cisco"
• Next in thread: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Question on UDLD..."
• Maybe reply: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Question on UDLD..."
• Maybe reply: Todd, Douglas M.: "RE: Question on UDLD..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi All,

I could not get the clear idea about UDLD normal mode.
It is defined like this.

"In normal mode, if the link state of the port was
determined to be bi−directional and the UDLD
information
times out, no action is taken by UDLD. The port state
for UDLD is marked as undetermined. The port
behaves according to its STP state."

Is the end effect not as bad as not having UDLD?

What do we gain with this?Can anyone please help me.

Thanks
Nambi

      Share files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one roof. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups

• Next message: Dinesh Patel: "test - first post"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Moving away from Cisco"
• Next in thread: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Question on UDLD..."
• Maybe reply: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Question on UDLD..."
• Maybe reply: Todd, Douglas M.: "RE: Question on UDLD..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST