From: YourPal (dearprudence28@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2008 - 14:18:40 ARST
Hi Derek,
Thanks for your reply.
In my scenario, I'm not concerned about redistributing iBGP routes into
OSPF. So I don't need the BGP command "bgp redistribute-internal". R6 has
eBGP peering with BB1 in which case I want to redistribute the learned eBGP
routes into OSPF.
Somehow in doing the BGP to OSPF redistribution I noticed the BGP summary
address got redistributed into OSPF too. So I suppose only iBGP routes are
not redistributed into IGPs by default. All other BGP routes are
redistributed. Anyone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thank you.
BR,
Emil
On 2/19/08, Derek <cciestudy@hkbsd.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Emil,
>
> You may try this command under router bgp.
>
> bgp redistribute-internal
>
> HTH
> Derek
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "YourPal" <dearprudence28@gmail.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 5:21 AM
> Subject: Will BGP aggregate-address be redistributed into IGPs?
>
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > I have the following config:
> >
> > R6:
> > !
> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > ip address 139.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > router bgp 100
> > network 139.1.6.0 mask 255.255.255.0
> > aggregate-address 139.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 summary-only
> > !
> > router ospf 1
> > redistribute bgp 100 subnets
> > !
> >
> > Output of "show ip ro bgp":
> >
> > B 139.1.0.0/16 [200/0] via 0.0.0.0, 10:16:30, Null0
> >
> >
> > Will the BGP aggregate address be redistributed into OSPF? I tested. It
> > seems yes. Is this because, by default only iBGP routes are not
> > redistributed into IGPs whereas eBGP and locally originated routes are?
> >
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > BR,
> > Emil
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST