From: Cisco-Engineer.com Team (ciscosurplus@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2008 - 15:59:30 ARST
Yes this is corect you understand the scenario, I also mad a lab, using as
you descibed and the traffic doesnt flow, debugging shows and invalid RP
address from the DM side!
On 12/02/2008, Sadiq Yakasai <sadiqtanko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> guys,
>
> so i have been thinking about this and this is what I cant get around
> my head...did i little bit of config and still got an invalid log msg.
>
> At some point in trying to achieve what Graham is trying to do, there
> has to be a segment on which one side is running sparse mode, while
> the other is running dense mode. The two sides would ofcourse form
> neigbour relationship (tried) but forwarding of traffic is where the
> issue would come up!
>
> The side with dense mode configured wld forward traffic out the
> interface, but the side running sparse wld not accept the traffic,
> would it?
>
> Hmmm, I wonder if I correctly understood the scenario anyway?
>
-- ThanksGraham Clarke
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:48 ARST