From: dara tomar (wish2ie@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Feb 10 2008 - 05:49:13 ARST
*Sorry Jay,
I didn't noted the IOS version at the time when I faced the issue.
But remembered it because it's one of those times that made me feel stupid
:( !!!
And was happy when I got to figure it's been corrected :) !!!
Regards,
Dara*
On Feb 8, 2008 9:07 PM, Swan, Jay <jswan@sugf.com> wrote:
> I would be curious to know what IOS this changed in, if true. I got in a
> geek debate with someone about this some years ago when teaching CCNP
> courses, and I think we tested back to 12.0, and the AD was always 1 for
> both formats. Trivia I know, but I'm a sucker for trivia. Anybody got
> any really old code versions sitting around?
>
> Jay
> #17783
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> dara tomar
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:31 AM
> To: Denise/Fishburne User
> Cc: Germany; Larry; Joseph Brunner; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Route preference
>
> *Ya,
> it used to be but recent version of IOS have resolved this issue.
>
>
> example:
>
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial 0/0
> ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 172.16.0.1
>
> .......... both routes have identical administrative distance:
>
> POP#show ip route 0.0.0.0
> Routing entry for 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0, supernet
> Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected), candidate default
> path
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * directly connected, via Serial0/0
> Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>
> POP#show ip route 10.0.0.0
> Routing entry for 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
> Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 172.16.0.1
> Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1*
>
>
> *Regards,
> Dara
>
>
> *On Feb 7, 2008 8:18 AM, Denise/Fishburne User <dfishbur@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Static pointing to a physical interface instead of a next hop is
> actually
> > an
> > AD of 0.
> >
> >
> > On 2/6/08 12:21 AM, "Germany" <ccie.gergonza@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Default AD for static is 1, 0 is for connected... Hey Robert, when
> you
> > > labbed it, did you try Josephs scenario (establishing the ospf route
> > first,
> > > then setting the static one)?
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Larry
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:21 AM
> > > To: Joseph Brunner
> > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: Route preference
> > >
> > > Only the static route would be put into the table as its default ad
> = 0:
> > >
> > > r1#show ip route 150.1.3.3
> > > Routing entry for 150.1.3.3/32
> > > Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65, type intra area
> > > Last update from 150.1.13.3 on Serial1/1, 00:00:26 ago
> > > Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> > > 150.1.13.3, from 150.1.3.3, 00:00:26 ago, via Serial1/1
> > > Route metric is 65, traffic share count is 1
> > > * 150.1.12.2, from 150.1.2.2, 00:00:26 ago, via Serial1/0.1
> > > Route metric is 65, traffic share count is 1
> > >
> > > r1#conf t
> > > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> > > r1(config)# ip route 150.1.3.3 255.255.255.255 150.1.13.3 110
> > r1(config)#^Z
> > > r1#show ip route 150.1.3.3 Routing entry for 150.1.3.3/32
> > > Known via "static", distance 110, metric 0
> > > Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> > > * 150.1.13.3
> > > Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1 -larry
> > >
> > > On 2/5/08, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Both would be in the routing table. But there will no load
> balancing
> > >> unless cef is disabled (no ip cef). With cef the OLDEST or first
> > >> learned route is USED only... so if you want true load balancing
> using
> > >> the routing table, disable cef.
> > >>
> > >> josCEF
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf
> > >> Of Robert CCIE
> > >> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:07 PM
> > >> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >> Subject: Route preference
> > >>
> > >> Hello Everyone,
> > >> I was just wondering how a router behaves in these situations. If
> a
> > >> router learns a route through a routing protocol but there is a
> static
> > >> route with the same admin distance configured. Which route would
> be
> > >> installed in the routing table? Or would both be installed? Also,
> > >> I'm guessing metrics only matter for that routing protocols process
> as
> > >> far as calculation since a static route has a metric of 0.
> > >>
> > >> So, if a router is learning 192.168.1.0/24 through ospf and there
> is a
> > >> static route for 192.168.1.0/24 with AD of 110. Thank you in
> advance.
> > >>
> > >> -Robert
> > >>
> > >>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> > >> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> > >> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:48 ARST