From: Sarfaraz Munir (sarfaraz.munir@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 07 2008 - 14:47:13 ARST
Dear Guys,
I will implement this in dynamips and will let you know if it would for me !
Thank you very much for your feedbacks.
With Regards,
On Feb 7, 2008 3:34 AM, Rich Collins <nilsi2002@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would think Huan's tunnel suggestion with PBR would work in your case.
> Even if the GLBP VIP was mostly associated with one router you should still
> set up both tunnels in case it jumped over to the other router.
>
> You just need a layer3 crossconnect between your two routers in order to
> set up the tunnels.
>
> -Rich
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 3:49 AM, Sarfaraz Munir <sarfaraz.munir@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I have similar kind of scenario that I am working on, but firewall is
> > forwarding the packet to only First router in GLBP group and there is
> > normal L2 switch between Firewall and these 2 routers. So anyone could
> > please comment on this, how can I achieve real Load balancing using
> > both router's WAN links with having only one Firewall pointing default
> > route towards VIP of GLBP group.
> >
> > With regards,
> >
> > Sarfaraz Muneer
> >
> > On 2/5/08, shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > when you arp for the virtual address assigned either GLBP/HSRP/VRRP
> > you will
> > > get only the MAC address assigned to the virtual address!
> > >
> > > GLBP is build in a way that it allow you to load share by methods of
> > your
> > > choice. and your arp will get based on the method the correct Virtual
> > MAC.
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cg/hiap_c/ch20/haipglbp.htm#wp1027129
> > > On Feb 5, 2008 10:08 AM, Aamir Aziz <aamiraz77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Group:
> > > >
> > > > I have a simple scenario:
> > > >
> > > > Router 1 Router 2
> > > > \ /
> > > > \ /
> > > > \ /
> > > > \ /
> > > > Switch 1
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > Firewall
> > > >
> > > > Router 1 and Router 2 are connected to Internet. Hosts are behind
> > the
> > > > firewall so how to acheive load-balancing in order to utilize both
> > the
> > > > Internet Links?. I want firewall to have one default route. If i use
> > > > GLBP on Router 1 and Router 2 it wont work as FW will arp and get
> > > > virtual MAC of any one router or i simply use the switch as layer 3
> > > > and define two default routes on the switch pointing towards Router
> > 1
> > > > and Router 2? what would be the best practice?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Aamir
> > > >
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Shiran Guez
> > > MCSE CCNP NCE1
> > > http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:47 ARST