From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Mon Jan 28 2008 - 11:53:06 ARST
hehehehe... Yup, I agree that we usually think about them as on or off.
Yes, that's most likely, but.... Just read the lab carefully and slowly and
it'll likely tell you what you need to know!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Johnson [mailto:dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:47 AM
To: smorris@ipexpert.com; wim.depauw@getronics.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPexpert lab 36 :Troubleshooting K-values
Ha ha, good point!! I thought they were either 1 or 0 - obviously not so
they can be weighted.....
You would have to be real lucky LOL to guess right. OK, it was a bad idea.
But I would guess in 99.9% of times that it would be either 1 or 0 -
although granted the lab could be the 0.1% time :-(
Dazzler
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:smorris@ipexpert.com]
Sent: 28 January 2008 13:37
To: 'Darren Johnson'; wim.depauw@getronics.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPexpert lab 36 :Troubleshooting K-values
Ummmm.... Actually, there are 1,078,203,909,375 possibilities. Each value
is 8-bits. :) (That's over 1 trillion and a little longer than we have
time to test out!)
Cat2-MST(config-router)#metric weights 0 ?
<0-255> K1
Cat2-MST(config-router)#metric weights 0 1 ?
<0-255> K2
Cat2-MST(config-router)#metric weights 0 1 1 ?
<0-255> K3
Cat2-MST(config-router)#metric weights 0 1 1 1 ?
<0-255> K4
Cat2-MST(config-router)#metric weights 0 1 1 1 1 ?
<0-255> K5
Cat2-MST(config-router)#metric weights 0 1 1 1 1 1 ?
<cr>
Cat2-MST(config-router)#metric weights 0 1 1 1 1 1
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Johnson [mailto:dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:46 AM
To: 'Scott Morris'; wim.depauw@getronics.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPexpert lab 36 :Troubleshooting K-values
Failing that, there are only 32 possible combinations. Try them all!!
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1
Etc
LOL!! Not a good use of time in the lab ;-)
Dazzler
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: 27 January 2008 14:45
To: wim.depauw@getronics.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPexpert lab 36 :Troubleshooting K-values
Nope. No method of discovering those other than very carefully re-reading
your lab scenario to get a hint of what othe option may be added/changed.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
wim.depauw@getronics.com
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:05 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPexpert lab 36 :Troubleshooting K-values
Hi,
How can I troubleshoot K-values mismatches ? In lab 36 you need to change
the k-values which raised the question with me how to troubleshoot it .
Suppose that the change the K-values on the backbone routers in the lab...
Is there a debug/show command whichs shows me the k-values that are
received/send by an EIGRP neighbor.
I tried all the debugging commands but no luck ...
gr
wim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:02 ARST