From: Swan, Jay (jswan@sugf.com)
Date: Wed Jan 23 2008 - 21:49:30 ARST
If you look at the interview I did with Russ White about the CCDE, some
of these questions are answered:
http://www.informit.com/podcasts/episode.aspx?e=1c0be78a-ee9b-411f-967b-
36a2f47893d5
http://www.informit.com/podcasts/episode.aspx?e=fc3c954f-d987-4393-8361-
15be49112806
In short, the idea for the CCDE was originally driven by folks inside
Cisco who work primarily on design, at very advanced levels. There's no
mention of specialization tracks.
In short, I don't think they've yet worked out exactly how the design
track will evolve, so it's probably useless to speculate.
Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hyunseog Ryu
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:40 AM
To: Dane Newman
Cc: Brant I. Stevens; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: CCDE Goes Live
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
So are they planning to do something like CCDE-RS, CCDE-SP, CCDE-Voice,
CCDE-Security in the future ?
I'm wondering how they will measure the score for Design.
It may come from different business model, and even with same business
model, it can be very different from organization to organization based
on a lot of resource availabilities - budget, engineering resource,
human resource, and political background, etc... -.
Hyun
Dane Newman wrote:
| So Is the CCDE going to devalue the CCIE at all? Will cisco require 4
| CCIE's/CCDE now?
|
| doing a design lab seems alittle less scary no?
|
| Dane
|
| On Jan 22, 2008 9:21 AM, Brant I. Stevens <branto@branto.com> wrote:
|
|> Just thought I'd share...
|>
|> http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/080122/0350542.html
|>
|>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:01 ARST