From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2008 - 03:50:05 ARST
Hi Mike
The burst is irrelevant for what you want to accomplish here the LLQ
priority works the same as Policing and so the burst command so It is not as
the Shaping you cant divide it by the TC as there is no concept of queuing
in Policing.
Regards,
On Jan 21, 2008 8:51 PM, Mike Stout <michaelgstout@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello:
> I did just did a lab where i had to configure FRTS with a line rate of
> 512K
> and TC=.01 ther is no burst.
> Next task. Configure a Priority queue for voice witha rate of 192K
> Question is, should i configure the BC in the priority queue?
> Question: Does MQC handle this based on the Frame Policy. or is this
> irrelevent because theFRTS is controlling the traffic rate?
> Thank You
>
> policy-map OUTBOUND
> class voice
> priority 192
>
> or should i configure
> policy-map OUTBOUND
> class voice
> priority 192 240
> (240 = 1920/8)
>
> Map-Class frame FRTS
> frame cir 512000
> frame bc 5120
> frame be = 0
> frame mincir = 512000
> frame fragment 640
> service-policy output OUTBOUND
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST