From: Cielieska Nathan (ncielieska@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 16:11:21 ARST
hows about
router rip
passive-interface s1/0
access-list 101 deny udp 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 eq 520
access-list 101 permit ip any any
int s1/0
ip access-group 101 in
Regards,
Nate
On Jan 21, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Gary Duncanson wrote:
> Offset-list can poison the route but will it actually prevent it
> being received by the interface?
>
> Requirement - 'RIP routes neither sent or received on the interface'
>
> Gary
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Johnson"
> <dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: "'Gary Duncanson'" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>; "'Farhan
> Anwar'" <farhan.anwar@gmail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:19 PM
> Subject: RE: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
> have no doubt about my answers.
>
>
>> Also, setting the AD to 255, or using an offset-list to make the
>> route
>> unreachable.....
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> It would be so much easier if RIP formed adj like EIGRP and OSPF ;-)
>>
>> Dazzler
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>> Behalf Of Gary
>> Duncanson
>> Sent: 19 January 2008 16:23
>> To: Farhan Anwar
>> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
>> have no
>> doubt about my answers.
>>
>> Will that block outbound or inbound depending on access-group in
>> or out?
>>
>> I take it you mean distribute list with gateway statement plus
>> extended acl
>> ?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Farhan Anwar
>> To: Gary Duncanson
>> Cc: Felix Nkansah ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 1:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
>> have no
>> doubt about my answers.
>>
>>
>> Distribute list with gateway statement + prefix-list denying that
>> gateway
>> and permitting others
>> or
>> an extended acl on interface having deny statement for rip.
>>
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2008 12:45 PM, Gary Duncanson
>> <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> That's a good one Felix. What would be a decent alternative do
>> you think
>> to
>> passive-interface? Distribute-list?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Felix Nkansah" <felixnkansah@gmail.com>
>> To: "sirus MOGHADASIAN" <cyrus.mgh@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I
>> have no
>> doubt about my answers.
>>
>>
>>
>> > HI sirus,
>> >
>> > It's difficult to understand why we failed or got low marks
>> in some
>> > sections. It requires a sincere examination of one's self to
>> admit a
>> > failure.
>> >
>> > A simple task may not be as simple as it seems. If it's that
>> simple,
>> why
>> > are
>> > you tested on it in the difficult & coveted CCIE lab. Besides,
>> remember
>> > that
>> > the the ccie lab is an 'ALL OR NOTHING GAME.'
>> >
>> > No partial credits. Marks are awarded for perfect answers
>> only (ones
>> that
>> > meet ALL requirements without breaking ANY requirement).
>> >
>> > As an example, let's assume a candidate had a task like below:
>> >
>> > TASK 3.X Configure RIP on R1 for the specified interfacees.
>> Ensure
>> that
>> > RIP
>> > routes are neither sent nor received on interface S1/0.
>> >
>> > This question is simple, but it only seems so. So we provide a
>> solution
>> > like
>> > below:
>> >
>> > R1
>> >
>> > router rip
>> > ver 2
>> > no auto
>> > network x.x.x.x
>> > network y.y.y.y
>> > passive-interface s1/0
>> >
>> > A candidate may assume the 'passive-interface' command would
>> meet the
>> > second
>> > requirement.
>> >
>> > WRONG.
>> >
>> > Passive-interface only prevents SENDING of routes, and not
>> RECEIVING
>> of
>> > routes. So the candidate scores a 0 for not meeting ALL
>> requirements
>> for
>> > this 'simple' task. He is perplexed and doubts his scores.
>> >
>> > Please dont give up. Reexamine yourself sincerely again. Take
>> the
>> > suggestions provided by the other experts, and you shall
>> surely come
>> home
>> > after your next lab with a number.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Felix
>> >
>> >
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> __
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> __
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Farhan Anwar
>> www.farhananwar.com
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> __
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Win tickets to the 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany with Yahoo!
>> Messenger. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/fifaworldcup_uk/
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/
> list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST