From: Cielieska Nathan (ncielieska@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 15:04:58 ARST
To add to that.
From what i understand the protected ports are locally signficant
and can only prohibit communication on that switch.
private vlans can be done across a dot1q or connected to other switches.
Regards,
Nate
On Jan 21, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Darren Johnson wrote:
> Hopefully this is a quick one. The Catalyst 3550s do not support
> private-vlans, but Catalyst 3560s do. I think this is correct.
>
> As a generalisation, private-vlans can prevent two hosts on the
> same subnet
> and 'vlan' from communicating. For the 3550s to do something
> similar to this
> concept, we use protected ports. Any ports within a VLAN that are
> protected
> cannot communicate (without L3 router). Therefore, in concept the
> protected
> ports feature with 3550s is similar to private-vlans with 3560s. In
> fact,
> going a stage further it is more like an isolated-private-vlan.
>
> Can someone confirm this or throw in there ideas?
>
> Dazzler
>
> P.S. one month today until my lab :-)
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail -
> quick, easy and free. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/trueswitch2.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST