From: Darren Johnson (dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 11:19:40 ARST
Also, setting the AD to 255, or using an offset-list to make the route
unreachable.....
:-)
It would be so much easier if RIP formed adj like EIGRP and OSPF ;-)
Dazzler
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Duncanson
Sent: 19 January 2008 16:23
To: Farhan Anwar
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I have no
doubt about my answers.
Will that block outbound or inbound depending on access-group in or out?
I take it you mean distribute list with gateway statement plus extended acl
?
----- Original Message -----
From: Farhan Anwar
To: Gary Duncanson
Cc: Felix Nkansah ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I have no
doubt about my answers.
Distribute list with gateway statement + prefix-list denying that gateway
and permitting others
or
an extended acl on interface having deny statement for rip.
On Jan 18, 2008 12:45 PM, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
wrote:
That's a good one Felix. What would be a decent alternative do you think
to
passive-interface? Distribute-list?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Felix Nkansah" <felixnkansah@gmail.com>
To: "sirus MOGHADASIAN" <cyrus.mgh@gmail.com>
Cc: "groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Failed on 6 Jan,Dubai, I don't know why even now I have no
doubt about my answers.
> HI sirus,
>
> It's difficult to understand why we failed or got low marks in some
> sections. It requires a sincere examination of one's self to admit a
> failure.
>
> A simple task may not be as simple as it seems. If it's that simple,
why
> are
> you tested on it in the difficult & coveted CCIE lab. Besides,
remember
> that
> the the ccie lab is an 'ALL OR NOTHING GAME.'
>
> No partial credits. Marks are awarded for perfect answers only (ones
that
> meet ALL requirements without breaking ANY requirement).
>
> As an example, let's assume a candidate had a task like below:
>
> TASK 3.X Configure RIP on R1 for the specified interfacees. Ensure
that
> RIP
> routes are neither sent nor received on interface S1/0.
>
> This question is simple, but it only seems so. So we provide a
solution
> like
> below:
>
> R1
>
> router rip
> ver 2
> no auto
> network x.x.x.x
> network y.y.y.y
> passive-interface s1/0
>
> A candidate may assume the 'passive-interface' command would meet the
> second
> requirement.
>
> WRONG.
>
> Passive-interface only prevents SENDING of routes, and not RECEIVING
of
> routes. So the candidate scores a 0 for not meeting ALL requirements
for
> this 'simple' task. He is perplexed and doubts his scores.
>
> Please dont give up. Reexamine yourself sincerely again. Take the
> suggestions provided by the other experts, and you shall surely come
home
> after your next lab with a number.
>
> Regards,
>
> Felix
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST