Re: CCIE Lab evaluation method

From: George Goglidze (goglidze@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2008 - 09:39:18 ARST


Don't worry they won't check your route-map word by word :)
they are checking just the end results by show ip route, traceroute, ping.
so if you achieve needed result, it does not matter how you achieved it, as
long as you did not break the requirement.

Regards,

On Jan 17, 2008 6:07 PM, Sridhar Vaidyanathan <vsridhar83@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Can anybody confirm as to how the proctor evaluates the lab exam. Someone
> told me that the Proctor uses a script that checks for specific commands
> in
> each section. I have a doubt here, let us take an example of
> redistribution.
> I normally use tags to control route-feedback. But, if this friend of mine
> is true then the script checks for specific commands in the route-map.
> For
> eg. Lemme demonstrate a redistribution example between OSPF and EIGRP.
> This
> is what I do normally:
>
> route-map eigrp->ospf deny 10
> match tag 110
> route-map eigrp->ospf permit 20
> match source-protocol eigrp 100
> set tag 90
>
> route-map ospf->eigrp deny 10
> match tag 90
> route-map ospf->eigrp permit 20
> match source-protocol ospf 1
> set tag 110
>
> router ospf 1
> redistribute eigrp 100 route-map eigrp->ospf subnets metric 100
>
> router eigrp 100
> redistribute ospf 1 route-map ospf->eigrp metric 1000 1000 1 1 1500
>
> There are many alternate ways of achieving the same like using an ACL to
> match specific subnets and calling it in route-map during redistribution.
> According to the friend of mine, if the script matches the commands, then
> my
> route-map configuration would be considered wrong though I am achieving
> the
> desired result using tags.
>
> I would request you all to shed some light on it as my lab date is nearing
> by.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sridhar
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST