RE: IPv6 Frame-relay map's

From: Wollmann, Bruno RQHR (Bruno.Wollmann@rqhealth.ca)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2008 - 13:57:48 ARST


It doesn't matter. As long as each DLCI that you have mapped has at
least 1 mapping using the broadcast option, you'll get the desired
results. You want to avoid putting it on both statements because that
means duplicate traffic down each DLCI.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Mick Vaites
Sent: January 14, 2008 6:25 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPv6 Frame-relay map's

Hi all,

I am puzzling over which is correct and which is not.

It is necessary to put in L2 / L3 mappings for both the actual IPv6
addressing as well as the lnik local addresses but which gets the
broadcast statement?

Senario: two routers connected for IPv6, R1 and R5 over a frame-relay
cloud, network is 2001:cc1e:5:15::x/64 and the DLCI's are 105 and 501
respectively. This are the possible snippets for R1. (apologies for any
obvious typos).

I am wondering which is right

!R1
Interface Serial 1/0
  ipv6 address 2001:cc1e:5:15::1/64
  ipv6 address fe80::1 link-local
  frame-relay map ipv6 fe80::5 105 broadcast <---- broadcast on the
link-local
  frame-relay map ipv6 2001:cc1e:5:15::5 105

or

!R1
Interface Serial 1/0
  ipv6 address 2001:cc1e:5:15::1/64
  ipv6 address fe80::1 link-local
  frame-relay map ipv6 fe80::5 105
  frame-relay map ipv6 2001:cc1e:5:15::5 105 broadcast <----- broadcast
on the main IP

I have tried both of these senarios and both work okay ?

Best regards

Mick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:38:00 ARST