Re: Cannot set interface for route manipulation in Route-map

From: bipin.atyale@hotmail.com
Date: Fri Jan 11 2008 - 08:40:45 ARST

• Next message: bipin.atyale@hotmail.com: "Re: disablng etherchannel on a switchport"
• Previous message: Salau, Yemi: "RE: 'Narbik Kocharians bootcamp feedbak ?"
• Maybe in reply to: seyfert22@googlemail.com: "Cannot set interface for route manipulation in Route-map"
• Next in thread: Herbert Maosa: "Re: Cannot set interface for route manipulation in Route-map"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Friend,

The set interface command is supported only over point-to-point links, unless a route cache entry exists using the same interface specified in the set interface command in the route map. Also, at the process level, the routing table is consulted to determine if the interface is on a reasonable path to the destination. During fast switching, the software does not make this check. Instead, if the packet matches, the software blindly forwards the packet to the specified interface.

Ans yes Set Default interface is not supported in PBR.

Just check whether the eo/1 int is peer to the neighbor.

Pls do reply.

Cheers ,
Bipin

• Next message: bipin.atyale@hotmail.com: "Re: disablng etherchannel on a switchport"
• Previous message: Salau, Yemi: "RE: 'Narbik Kocharians bootcamp feedbak ?"
• Maybe in reply to: seyfert22@googlemail.com: "Cannot set interface for route manipulation in Route-map"
• Next in thread: Herbert Maosa: "Re: Cannot set interface for route manipulation in Route-map"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:58 ARST