From: dara tomar (wish2ie@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2008 - 18:04:08 ARST
*Hi,
Just a query ....
what is no arp frame responsible for ???
Dara*
On Jan 9, 2008 7:04 PM, Monica Belluci <mpls1979@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jopal,
>
> shut the interface ->encapsulation Frame-relay > no frame inverse + no arp
> frame
> you will not find 0.0.0.0 entry.
>
> Nalini Roy
>
> On Jan 8, 2008 2:50 PM, Manu Ohri (mohri) <mohri@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> > Shut the interface before applying the frame-relay encaps.
> > That will help.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Gupta, Gopal (NWCC)
> > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 11:37 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: FRAME-RELAY MAP
> >
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > Why do we have frame-relay map statements 0.0.0.0 when we turn on the
> > interface for Frame-Relay it is ermoved only after reload of the Router.
> > Even when i change the Encapsulation to PPP other than frame-relay and
> > get back to Frame-relay again, still it shows 0.0.0.0 Statements.
> > What are these statements and why are they occured or what is the use of
> > them??
> >
> > Thanks
> > Gops
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:58 ARST