Re: channel protocol needed ?

From: Ramiro Garza (ccie15xxx@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2008 - 02:17:10 ARST

• Next message: Steven Hodgson: "RE: comments from 1st time fail"
• Previous message: Scott Vermillion: "RE: IE R&S lab 3... try this out !"
• Maybe in reply to: Navid Daghighi: "channel protocol needed ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Navid,
  The "channel-protocol pagp" cli is optional, it's sole purpose is to keep
the user from entering a different type of etherchannel protocol (ie. lacp).

Regards,
Ramiro G.

On 1/8/08, Navid Daghighi <smart4D@free.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if I type "channel-group 1 mode desirable" on both sides, I do NOT need
> to type "channel-protocol pagp" ?
>
> one of the vendor's solution guides indicates to type both commands
>
> the requirement was "SW3 and SW4 should actively attempt to negotiate a
> layer 3 etherchannel using Papg"
>
> thanks,
> Navid
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Steven Hodgson: "RE: comments from 1st time fail"
• Previous message: Scott Vermillion: "RE: IE R&S lab 3... try this out !"
• Maybe in reply to: Navid Daghighi: "channel protocol needed ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:58 ARST