Re: EIGRP Feasibility Condition

From: Eric Leung (eric.lwc@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2008 - 04:01:05 ARST


Hi Herbert,

would you mind post the configuration?

eric.

2008/1/7, Herbert Maosa <asawilunda@googlemail.com>:
>
> It could be very early in the morning and I probably am missing something
> fundamental here. Look at the output below. Shouldn't the highlighted path
> be excluded from the EIGRP topology table based on failing the feasibility
> condition according to the current feasible distance ?
>
>
> sh ip eigrp topo 222.22.2.0
> IP-EIGRP (AS 1024): Topology entry for 222.22.2.0/24
> State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 30720
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> 174.1.45.5 (FastEthernet0/1), from 174.1.45.5, Send flag is 0x0
> Composite metric is (30720/28160), Route is External
> Vector metric:
> Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit
> Total delay is 200 microseconds
> Reliability is 255/255
> Load is 1/255
> Minimum MTU is 1500
> Hop count is 1
> External data:
> Originating router is 150.1.5.5
> AS number of route is 0
> External protocol is RIP, external metric is 7
> Administrator tag is 0 (0x00000000)
> * 174.1.145.1 (Serial0/0/0), from 174.1.145.1, Send flag is 0x0
> Composite metric is (2684416/2172416), Route is External*
> Vector metric:
> Minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
> Total delay is 40100 microseconds
> Reliability is 255/255
> Load is 1/255
> Minimum MTU is 1500
> Hop count is 2
> External data:
> Originating router is 150.1.5.5
> AS number of route is 0
> External protocol is RIP, external metric is 7
> Administrator tag is 0 (0x00000000)
>
> Herbert.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:58 ARST