From: Steven Hodgson (steven.hodgson@inxi.com)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2008 - 11:51:16 ARST
Ok, that make sense then. Thanks. It was a little frustrating.
From: Joseph Saad [mailto:joseph.samir.saad@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:50 AM
To: Steven Hodgson
Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 7 SW2 connection to R1 and R3
You have a problem then. Because the task reference by Shiran is Q-in-Q
tunneling. dynamips-based switch doesn't support it. May be an oversight
on the side of IE in developing their Dynamips-based labs.
On Jan 3, 2008 5:39 PM, Steven Hodgson <steven.hodgson@inxi.com> wrote:
It is IEWB-RS-DYN v4.1 which is reworked from Vol II.
From: Joseph Saad [mailto:joseph.samir.saad@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:37 AM
To: Steven Hodgson
Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 7 SW2 connection to R1 and R3
This is not Lab 7, Vol II.
On Jan 3, 2008 5:14 PM, Steven Hodgson <steven.hodgson@inxi.com> wrote:
Are you sure this is the task you meant?
1.4 Rate-Limiting
* Configure SW1 Fa1/5 to limit unicast traffic inbound to 25% of the
interfaces bandwidth
* Use the minimal configuration possible for this task
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
shiran guez
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:09 AM
To: steveaggie@gmail.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 7 SW2 connection to R1 and R3
Task 1.4 on Lab 7 Guide you and tell you also how to do that.
On Jan 3, 2008 4:08 AM, <steveaggie@gmail.com> wrote:
> In Lab 7 it shows that SW2 has a layer 3 connection to R1 and R3.
> However,
> there are no tasks in the lab which as you to set this up. Since
these
> devices are not adjacent to each other, I assume that VLANs have to be
> created to trunk the traffic through the intermediate switch (SW1).
>
>
>
> Was this an oversight when they made it work with dynamips?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:57 ARST