From: Chan Hong (chan_hong33@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Dec 24 2007 - 04:09:53 ART
protected port and private vland has similar functions.
the only difference is
that protected port only apply to single switch(can't cross switches) and it
don't have function like community vlan
----- 6l%s-l%s ----
1H%s$H!R Joseph
Saad <joseph.samir.saad@gmail.com>
&,%s$H Cisco certification
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
6G0e$i4A!R 2007 &~ 12$k 21 $i ,P4A$- $U$H 9:03:23
%DCD!G Re: Internetworkk expert vol 2 ver 4.1 Lab 17 Ques 1.3 Traffic
engineering
On the same switch, you can use either protected ports or Private
VLAN's.
in Protected mode, 2 protected-mode ports don't forward traffic to
each
other but can forward traffic on non-protected ports.
If the 2 ports are
on 2 different switches, you are forced with the "Private
VLAN's" approach.
Joseph.
On Dec 21, 2007 1:59 PM, abdul muhammed <abdulmuri@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I expected the scenario 1.3 on traffic engineering to be treated as
a
> private Vlan rather than a Protected port since it involves 2 web server
>
in
> the same VLAN of switch 1 port Fa0/10 and 11 respectively.
> because the
admistrator is concerned that a compromise on one web server
> could lead to
attack on the other. in other to prevent this, configure
> switch one so that
these server can not pass traffic between each other
>
>
> please comment on
this.
>
> thanks
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:32 ARST