From: Kim teu (kim.teu@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 22 2007 - 02:40:47 ART
Scott,
The "redistribute connec route-map LOOPBACK_ONLY" should be under RIP
process, not OSPF process. Then, when you redistribute ospf under RIP, only
loopback interface get redistributed, but not other OSPF enabled interfaces.
HTH,
Kim
On 12/21/07, Scott M Vermillion <scott@it-ag.com> wrote:
>
> OK folks, admittedly a soft spot in my underbelly here.
>
>
>
> Redistribution rules as I have come to understand them (not necessarily in
> any kind of order):
>
>
>
> --redistribute any routes learned from the protocol being redistributed
>
> --redistribute any connected interfaces that are covered by network
> statement under the protocol being redistributed
>
> --however, if a 'redistribute connected' statement exists in the protocol
> being redistributed, only redistribute those connected interfaces which
> are
> allowed in the manual 'redistribute connected' statement
>
>
>
> So, for example, if I have router R1 running both RIP and OSPF, and I have
> redistributed my loopback interface into OSPF with a route-map permitting
> *only* the loopback to go into OSPF, then if I then later redistribute
> OSPF
> into RIP, I will get all routes learned by OSPF in RIP but I will not get
> the networks of directly connected links/interfaces running OSPF, because
> my
> route-map didn't encompass anything but the loopback interface.
>
> I thought I finally understood this concept correctly. Do I?
>
>
>
> Because in my lab, I'm not seeing this. I have the exact scenario above
> configured. In a Solutions Guide, it shows doing a 'redistribute
> connected'
> under the RIP process, presumably in an effort to pull in directly
> connected
> non-RIP/OSPF networks as well as those *learned* by OSPF. Right? Or
> wrong?
> Because I am observing zero difference whether this manual redistribution
> of
> connected exists under the RIP process or not. I do in fact seem to get
> the
> directly connected non-RIP/OSPF networks showing up in and being
> advertised
> into RIP, even sans a manual redistribution of connected under RIP.
>
>
>
> So I ask you once again, am I on something good? Are my pupils perhaps a
> little dilated this evening? Please advise.
>
>
>
> Regards all,
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:31 ARST