From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2007 - 23:29:18 ART
This is a tough one but look at what happens to the
broadcast after it transits the gateway and becomes a
directed broadcast.
The DHCP Server will acknowledge that it came from
that network with the appropriate IP Address assigned
to it and from there assign an address from the pool.
Now, conversely I could still use more than one
network using subinterfaces, however, while there may
be some tricks that I, myself, have used. I do not
think per the RFC this was an option. And I went the
process about 2 years ago in agonizing detail of
working this one out at the bit level.
The option, as I recall, that worked for me at the
time was to change the primary and secondary addresses
depending on which subnet and corresponding scope I
wanted to use.
Someone please let me know if there was a better
solution.
--- George Goglidze <goglidze@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> why don't you configure that address as secondary on
> the interface???
> it should work that way :)
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2007 7:26 PM, <wim.depauw@getronics.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In one the labs of internetwork expert you have
> the following question
> >
> > Suppose a consultant configures a DHCP server and
> misconfigures the
> > default gateway ( ex 192.168.1.254 ) . Configure
> your router with IP
> > address 192.168.1.3 to answer on ARP requests for
> 192.168.1.254 .
> >
> > I first thought to configure proxy-arp but this is
> for different subnets,
> > does anybody have an idea ?
> >
> > gr
> > Wim
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:31 ARST