From: Juan-Pablo (jpchapero@terra.es)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2007 - 18:50:21 ART
Hi,
it is possible, but a tricky question. As you have noted, vtp
advertisements doesn't pass trough sw2, as it has a different vtp domain
name. What i recommend to you is to create a dot1q tunnel or even use l2
forwarding to solve that between sw1 and sw3.
Regards,
JP
El dg 16 de 12 del 2007 a les 23:55 +0400, en/na Joseph Saad va
escriure:
> Bhaskar, it didn't work for me either. Someone mentioned earlier that it's a
> documentation bug and it ideally shouldn't work with the switches, but it
> was working with 3725 Switch module.
>
> http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200708/msg02407.html
>
> HTH,
> Joseph.
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2007 7:56 PM, Bhaskar Sivanesan <bas_bharath@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > group,
> >
> > Is it possible to have a following setup.
> >
> > sw1---sw2---sw3
> >
> > sw1 and sw3 in vtp domain vtp1, sw1 is the server and sw3 is client.
> > sw2 is in vtp domain vtp2.
> >
> > Will sw2 forward the VTP updates from sw1 to sw3 although its in a
> > different domain. I configured sw2 to be in transparent mode and used
> > vtp-v2. But doesn't work.
> >
> > cheers
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:31 ARST