From: Godswill Oletu (oletu@inbox.lv)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2007 - 01:48:29 ART
I believe they are asking you to do CBWFQ with FRTS,
Use an access list to match the RIP traffic based on port or/and ip address
that rip uses to send its messages, configure a class map for that traffic
and call it in your policy map, everything so far is just done as in MQC,
but instead of applying the policy-map under your interface, call the policy
map in your frame relay map class...
eg..
!
access-list 101 <match RIP packets>
class-map match-all RIP
match access-group 101
!
policy-map RIP
class RIP
priority XX
!
map-class frame-relay XXX
frame-relay cir .......
frame-relay mincir ......
frame-relay bc ....
etc, etc, etc
service-policy output RIP
!
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
no fair-queue
frame-relay traffic-shaping
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.0.0.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 18
frame-relay class XXX
!
You see that the RIP traffic had been assigned to a priority class and
guranteed a particular bandwidth, all you did in the frame calss map is to
call the RIP priority class.
Godswill Oletu
CCIE #16464 (R&S)
----- Original Message -----
From: "PANDI MOORTHY" <moorthypandi@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 9:54 PM
Subject: How do I exclude RIP traffic in FRTS?
> Hi Group
>
>
>
> My task is to configure the frame-relay traffic shaping on the WAN
> interface
> to 512K, make sure RIP traffic are not candidate to be shaped or dropped.
> How do I exclude this RIP traffic in FRTS?
>
>
>
> I know we can achieve this by MQC based traffic shaping.
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't see any options are available under map-class to exclude some
> traffic alone
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Pandi
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST