RE: Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?

From: Phillip.McCollum@ins.com
Date: Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:13:22 ART

Next message: Jonny English: "OT: Sitting Bootcamps and Exams in the US"
Previous message: Laidlaw, Patrick A.: "RE: SPT flapping"
Maybe in reply to: Felix Nkansah: "Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?"
Next in thread: Mike Stout: "Re: Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I would guess Q1 has to do with 'autocommand'. And agree that Q2 is IP
accounting.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Felix Nkansah
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:51 AM
To: groupstudy
Subject: Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?

Hi,

I need your opinion on these tasks.

Three routers are connected in this way: R1 and R3 both connect to R2

R1 has IP address of 192.168.12.1 and connects to R2 of interface IP
192.168.12.2

R3 has IP address of 192.168.23.3 and connects to R2 of interface IP
192.168.23.2

R1 - 192.168.12.0/24 - R2 - 192.168.23.0/24 - R3

*Q1. The requirement is that, if R1 telnets to 192.168.12.254, it should
result in a telnet to R3.*
**
*Q2. R2 should account ONLY for the number of packets/bytes sent by host
192.168.12.254.*

What do you think? I suppose I should be able to use static NAT to solve
Q1
and IP accounting for Q2. But how do I use IP accounting to meet the
'ONLY'
request.

Regards,

Felix

Next message: Jonny English: "OT: Sitting Bootcamps and Exams in the US"
Previous message: Laidlaw, Patrick A.: "RE: SPT flapping"
Maybe in reply to: Felix Nkansah: "Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?"
Next in thread: Mike Stout: "Re: Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST