From: Phil Priest (ppriest@comms-care.com)
Date: Fri Dec 14 2007 - 07:51:31 ART
Hi All,
A side issue but on the same subject...
Does anybody have a document that details the exact process with regards
to the voice vlan and using CDP. I know that Mitel phones use CDP and
negotiate themselves into the voice vlan if the voice vlan command
exists but I just want more details on the exact process.
Regards
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Darren Johnson
Sent: 13 December 2007 11:46
To: 'nhatphuc'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Trust VoIP and remark Data
Hey there! I believe your second option is wrong, you don't need the
override and you need to trust cos. I would do it like this....
mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos trust cos
mls qos cos 1
This says trust the COS value ONLY if a Cisco phone is detected via CDP,
and
any packets/frames without a COS value (such as those received from a PC
on
the native vlan) use a COS value of 1. The COS override would 'override'
any
COS values to 1, including COS values received from the phone!! I don't
believe you want to do this!
Dazzler
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
nhatphuc
Sent: 12 December 2007 17:55
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Trust VoIP and remark Data
Hi Group,
With question: Ensure that VoIP traffic originating from the IP phones
maintains its CoS value, while traffic originating from the PCs is
remarked with a CoS of 1
I see 2 ways to answer. The first seems to be better, but I don't see
anything wrong with the second. Which one do you choose? Please explain.
mls qos trust cos
switchport priority extend cos 1
and
mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos cos 1 override
Thank you
Phuc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST