From: George Goglidze (goglidze@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2007 - 05:27:42 ART
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for the correction :))))
Regards,
On Dec 12, 2007 10:06 PM, Carlos Trujillo Jimenez <nergal888@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi george, your answer is good, but one observation is that the macro
> result
> of the command
> spanning-tree vlan 1 root primary specifiyng the diameter value, changes
> only the max age and forward delay times, not the hello time.
> You can also specify the hello time, followed by the diameter command.
> for the rest, your answer is good.
>
>
>
> >From: "George Goglidze" <goglidze@gmail.com>
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Dec 2007 20:55:24.0087 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[50DB4C70:01C83D01]
> >
> >Hi Nathan,
> >
> >It does not actually react dynamically when the new router is added.
> >
> >the "spanning-tree vlan 20,30,40 root primary " is just a script
> >which will check current root switch's priority, and set 4096 less.
> >as well it calculates hello-interval and forward-interval if I'm not
> >mistaken, if you specify your network's size.
> >
> >but once the script is run, and later if you add another switch with
> better
> >priority,
> >it does not mean you will have your router re-calculate the priority
> again.
> >
> >And as to the initial question, I'd just put 4096 as priority and that's
> >it.
> >also maybe I would ask proctor if new switches are going to have default
> >configuration of spanning tree or not.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >
> >On Dec 12, 2007 8:22 PM, Cielieska Nathan <ncielieska@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Felix
> > >
> > > Do a spanning-tree vlan 20,30,40 root primary.
> > >
> > > The reason i would do that is because there are other calculations
> > > besides priority that can come into play. Setting the root command
> > > will allow the switch to react dynamically to spanning-tree elections
> > > by tuning things in its favor to become root.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nate
> > >
> > > On Dec 12, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Felix Nkansah wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am considering a spanning-tree task (dont have the answers tho).
> > > >
> > > > *It requires that, of the four switches in the network, SW1 be set
> > > > as the
> > > > root for VLANs 20, 30, 40.*
> > > > **
> > > > *SW1 should be set such that it would remain the root if even other
> > > > switches
> > > > are added to the network in future.*
> > > >
> > > > Would setting a command like *'spanning-tree vlan 20,30,40 priority
> > > > 0'* be a
> > > > good solution?
> > > >
> > > > I'm afraid the *'spanning-tree vlan 20,30,40 root primary'* command
> > > > may not
> > > > be able to cater for the 'future switches' caveat.
> > > >
> > > > Let me have your expert opinions, please.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Felix
> > > >
> > > >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> > > > _
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Charla con tus amigos en lmnea mediante MSN Messenger:
> http://messenger.latam.msn.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST