From: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez (nergal888@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2007 - 18:12:21 ART
Yes, you are wright Subdoh the answer depends on how we (you and me, and if
it was the real exam) interpret.
both answers are valid solutions, since I focused in the "WAN" word in his
question I interpret it was a routing link, indeed there are also layer 2
wan links, as well as layer 3 wan links, but as you mentioned both answers
are valid.
>From: <subodh.rawat@wipro.com>
>Return-Path: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
>
>I amd assuming Henro is not doing any sort of Routing on switches.
>10.10.10.1 and 10.10.10.2 are host IP addresses connected to switch 1 and
>2. So configuarion suggested by you seems unnecessary.
>
>Enabling same VLAN on all ports (Sw1 host port, sw1 (f0/1), sw2 (f0/1), sw2
>host port) will work just fine and will not impose any overheads (dot1q or
>ISL) on frames traveling switch 1 to 2.
>
>Henro, correct me if I misunderstood your requirement.
>
>However, if switch is routing and 10.10.10.1 and 10.10.10.2 are IP
>addresses on switch 1 and 2 for VLAN-A then you are right.
>
>Thanks
>Subodh
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez [mailto:nergal888@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 5:19 AM
>To: kim.teu@gmail.com; Subodh Singh Rawat (WT01 - TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDER)
>Cc: ugwuadu@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: VLAN over switch routed port (WAN)
>
>
>yeah, but if he enable fas0/1 of both switches as access ports belonging
>both to the same vlan, he LOOSES the network 10.10.10.0/30 between both
>switches,and if those switchports are doing routing, with expanding the
>vlan YOU ALSO LOOSE THE ROUTING SUBNET PRESENT BETWEEN BOTH SWITCHES.
>
>I have an alternative solution.
>
>What about enabling IRB between both switches, thus expanding VLAN A
>between both switches, and also, using the already present 10.10.10.0/30
>network?
>THUS NOT LOOSING THE ROUTING BETWEEN BOTH SWITCHES.
>
>
>First of all make sure if both switches support IRB.
>
>FOR SW1
>
>int vlanX (VLAN A)
>bridge-group 1
>
>int fas 0/1
>bridge-group 1
>
>int bvi 1
>ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
>ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x secondary (VLAN A SUBNET)
>
>FOR SW2
>
>int vlanX (VLAN A)
>bridge-group 1
>
>int fas 0/1
>bridge-group 1
>
>int bvi 1
>ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.252
>ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x secondary (VLAN A SUBNET)
>
>with this configuration you have EXTENTED VLAN A SUBNET without loosing the
>routing subnet between both switches.
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Kim teu" <kim.teu@gmail.com>
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2007 21:55:47.0584 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[6BCD9000:01C83B77]
> >
> >Yup. Just make fa0/1 of both switches in VLAN-A would not introduce
> >addition
> >trunking encapsulation overhead.
> >
> >On 12/10/07, subodh.rawat@wipro.com <subodh.rawat@wipro.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Try to make f0/1 of Switch 1&2 as access port with same vlan, VLAN-A.
> > >
> > > Subodh
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>Of
> > > henro
> > > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 1:29 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: VLAN over switch routed port (WAN)
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I have the following scenario
> > >
> > >
> > > VLAN-A
> > > =====SW1-f0/1==============================SW2-f0/1==========VLAN-A
> > > 10.10.10.1/30
> > > 10.10.10.2/30
> > >
> > > How can I extend VLAN-A across the WAN link between SW1 and SW2 as
>shown
> > > above without introducing overhead.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Henro
> > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > > The information contained in this electronic message and any
>attachments
> > > to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
> >and
> > > may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If
>you
> >are
> > > not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
> >copy
> > > this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all
>copies
> >of
> > > this message and any attachments.
> > >
> > > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
> > > should check this email and any attachments for the presence of
>viruses.
> >The
> > > company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> >transmitted
> > > by this email.
> > >
> > > www.wipro.com
> > >
> > >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Charla con tus amigos en lmnea mediante MSN Messenger:
>http://messenger.latam.msn.com/
>
>
>
>The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
>this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
>contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not
>the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
>e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
>message and any attachments.
>
>WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
>should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
>The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
>transmitted by this email.
>
>www.wipro.com
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST