_100$ OR ^100$

From: Mohammad Saeed (mzsaeed@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2007 - 17:04:22 ART

• Next message: shiran guez: "Re: OSPF Neighbour config wont stick in config ?"
• Previous message: George Goglidze: "Re: OSPF Neighbour config wont stick in config ?"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: subodh.rawat@wipro.com: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Laidlaw, Patrick A.: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: MrPaul: "Re: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Sharifi, Reza: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

If I have R1 in AS 50 peering with R2 in AS 100. if I want R1 to learn
routes only originated in AS100 only from R2, which as-path acl will
be correct?

ip as-path access-list 1 match _100$

OR

ip as-path access-list 1 match ^100$

route-map FIL permit 10
match as-path 1

on R1 I apply this route-map incoming to R2

Regards,

Mohammad Zahed Saeed

• Next message: shiran guez: "Re: OSPF Neighbour config wont stick in config ?"
• Previous message: George Goglidze: "Re: OSPF Neighbour config wont stick in config ?"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: subodh.rawat@wipro.com: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Laidlaw, Patrick A.: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: MrPaul: "Re: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Sharifi, Reza: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: _100$ OR ^100$"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST