From: Cielieska Nathan (ncielieska@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2007 - 16:22:56 ART
Felix
Do a spanning-tree vlan 20,30,40 root primary.
The reason i would do that is because there are other calculations
besides priority that can come into play. Setting the root command
will allow the switch to react dynamically to spanning-tree elections
by tuning things in its favor to become root.
Regards,
Nate
On Dec 12, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Felix Nkansah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am considering a spanning-tree task (dont have the answers tho).
>
> *It requires that, of the four switches in the network, SW1 be set
> as the
> root for VLANs 20, 30, 40.*
> **
> *SW1 should be set such that it would remain the root if even other
> switches
> are added to the network in future.*
>
> Would setting a command like *'spanning-tree vlan 20,30,40 priority
> 0'* be a
> good solution?
>
> I'm afraid the *'spanning-tree vlan 20,30,40 root primary'* command
> may not
> be able to cater for the 'future switches' caveat.
>
> Let me have your expert opinions, please.
>
> Regards,
>
> Felix
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST