Re: RSPAN ISSUE....

From: Joseph Saad (joseph.samir.saad@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2007 - 03:28:42 ART


That's interesting.

in my opinion, this what I would be doing:

1) on all switches that the traffic is transiting for vlan x, you must have
vlan x
 remote-span

This could be only sw2 and sw3 or all the 4 switches. depend on the spanning
Tree topology and link speeds.

2) ON SW2
monitor session 1 source interface gigabitEthernet 0/3 both
monitor session 1 dest remote vlan x

ON SW3
monitor session 1 source remote vlan x
monitor session 1 dest interface gigabitEthernnet 0/7

HTH,

Joseph.
On 12/12/07, itsfortarget iwillgetit <itsfortarget@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> sw-->sw2->sw3->sw4 ita full mesh layer 2 network ,,I hope this is what u
> need ..
>
> On Dec 12, 2007 10:33 AM, Joseph Saad <joseph.samir.saad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > How is the topology look like?
> >
> > On 12/12/07, itsfortarget iwillgetit <itsfortarget@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Daear Grup,
> > >
> > > Pls throw your light...
> > >
> > > I have sw1(VTP server ) and sw2 and sw3 as client .I need to monitor
> > > th
> > > traffic from sw2 (port 0/3) to sw 3 ( port 0/7)
> > >
> > > letm ek now how to do it
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST