From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2007 - 21:27:43 ART
Well...
This the short end of it:
1. OSPF -> Don't do it.
2. RIP -> Yep - Love it - in fact it is part of my
routine for basic configuration opening moves unless
otherwise specified.
3. EIGRP -> Case by Case Basis. But generally I read
the lab requirements for this one. I'd have to say I
use it more than I do not.
Now... With that said. I use router-id for OSPF, bgp
router-id for BGP, and eigrp router-id for EIGRP.
Habitual and I use the loopback 0 address for each.
--- Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Getting late here so here's a wooly reply which Im
> sure someone will expand
> on..but I recall that the effect of the command on
> things sent and things
> received differs by protocol somewhat.
>
> Gary
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Hanks" <t_hanks_2007@yahoo.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 9:14 PM
> Subject: Passive Interface
>
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > What is the difference between the effect of
> 'passive interface' in RIP,
> > EIGRP, OSPF ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST